Supreme Court · 1960 INSC 135 · Decided 31 August 1960

Raja Narayanlal Bansilal v. Maneck Phjhoz Misthy and ANOTHER.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1960 INSC 135 · [1961] 1 S.C.R. 417
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 268/1959
Decided
31 August 1960
Bench
BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N. WANCHOO, K.C. DAS GUPTA, J.C. SHAH (5-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Evidence Act Section 132; Constitution Article 235, 239, 240, 645, 646, 20(3), 14; Companies Act Section 137, 240

Headnote

SUPREME COURT REPORTS 417 RAJA NARAYANLAL BANSILAL v. MANECK PHJHOZ MISTHY AND ANOTHER. (B. P. SINHA, c .. J., P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. \;VANCHOO, K. C. DAs GUPTA and J. c. SHAH, JJ.) Company-Investigation into affairs of-Inspector appoi11tcd 11nder olcf Act, if can exercise of evidence offend g·uarantcr-Indian Companies Act, r913 (VII of I9IJ), s. I JS-­ Indian Companies Act, I956 (I of I95fi), ss. 235, 239, 240, 645 and 646, Constitution.of India, Arn. I4 and 20(3). On November 15, 1954, the Registrar wrote to the company of which the appellant

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)