Supreme Court · 2004 INSC 41 · Decided 20 January 2004
Raj Kumar v. Sardari Lal
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2004 INSC 41 · [2004] 1 S.C.R. 838
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 400/2004
- Decided
- 20 January 2004
- Bench
- R.C. LAHOTI, ASHOK BHAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 146; Transfer of Property Act Section 52; Limitation Act Section 5
Headnote
Code a/Civil Procedure, 1908-0rder 9 Rule 13, Order 22 Rule JO and Section 146-Transfer of property pending suit thereon-Suit decreed ex- C parte against transferor-Setting aside of decree not by transferor but by a person who did not come or was not brought on record promptly­ Maintainability to move application under Order 9 Rule 13 to set aside the decree passed against his transferor­ defendant in suit-Word 'he· under Order 9 Rule 13 is not to be construed D rigidly and restrictively so as to exclude person stepping into the shoes of transferor-defendant, from moving
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)