Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 334 · Decided 29 February 1996
Raj Kumar Bindlish v. State of Haryana and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 334 · [1996] 3 S.C.R. 77
- Case number
- WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 68/1990
- Decided
- 29 February 1996
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, S. SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B. PATTANAIK (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Writ / Constitutional
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 233, 32
Headnote
BINDLISH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. FEBRUARY 29, 1996 [K. RAMASWAMY, S. SAGH!R AHMAD AND G.B. PATIANAIK, JJ.) Constitution of India, 1950 : Article 233. A B Additional District and Sessions Judges-Appointment of-Procedure C for-Haryana Higher Judicial Servic~Selection of members of Bar as definite procedure adopted for selection appoint­ ment in question could not be set at naught-Since long period has elapsed after appointment unsettling the selection already made held not D prope~ven otherwise no tangible illegality found in appointment-Writ challenging appointment
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)