Supreme Court · 1989 INSC 180 · Decided 4 May 1989
Raipur Development Authority ETC. ETC. v. Chokhamal Contractors ETC. ETC.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1989 INSC 180 · [1989] 3 S.C.R. 144
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3137/1985
- Decided
- 4 May 1989
- Bench
- R.S. PATHAK, E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, RANGANATH MISRA, M.N. VENKATACHALIAH, N.D. OJHA (5-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Remitted to Lower Court
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Arbitration Act Section 16(J)(c), 20, 21
Headnote
Arbitration Act, 1940: Sections 16(J)(c), 20, 21 and JO(c), 32- A ward-Whether liable to be set aside on ground that no reasons have • been given-Necessity to give reasons where statute or Court orders. ,.: c Government Contracts: Government and their instrumentalities- Should as matter interest-Ensure that arbitration clause provides for speaking awards by arbitrators. Administrative Law: Natural Justice-Principles of-Furnishing reasons in support of decision-Not applicable to cases arising under D the law of arbitration which is intended for settlement of private disputes.
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)