Supreme Court · 1999 INSC 476 · Decided 13 October 1999
Raghunath G. Panhale (Dead) BY LRS. v. M/S. Chaganlal Sundarji and CO.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1999 INSC 476 · [1999] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 629
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5925/1999
- Decided
- 13 October 1999
- Bench
- M. JAGANNADHA RAO, AJAY PRAKASH MISRA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 227, 136
Headnote
B - Rent Control and Eviction : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging & House Rates (Control) Act, 1947-S.13(1)(g}-Eviction-Non-residential premises-Eviction suit on the c =-· ground of bonafide requirement of landlord-Premises required for starting a grocery business after being rendered pennanently lost his job, there is no proof of availability of capital for investment and experience in grocery business-Non-interference by High Court with the concumnt findings of fact D -Held; bonafide requirement does not mean 'dire', 'absolute' or 'compelling necessities'---Landlord need not
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)