Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 10 · Decided 7 January 2000
Ragavendra Kumar v. Firm Prem Machinery and CO.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 10 · [2000] 1 S.C.R. 77
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3663/1998
- Decided
- 7 January 2000
- Bench
- V.N. KHARE, S.N. PHUKAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
B Rent Control & Eviction : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 : Section 12(1)(!)-Appellant/landlord filed a suit for eviction on the ground of C bonafide requirement-Stated in evidence that the owner haJ several other shops and houses but they were not vacant and also not suitable Court held that burden of proving his bonafide need was on the Appellant/landlord- -First appeal dismissetf-High CouTt allowed second appea~Assumed that Appellant/landlord admitted of having other premises--On appeal, Held : Landlord is best Judge of his requirement-High CouTt erred in
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)