Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 411 · Decided 11 July 2006
Pushpa Devi Bhagat (D) TH. LR. SMT. Sadhna Rai v. Rajinder Singh and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 411 · [2006] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 370
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2896/2006
- Decided
- 11 July 2006
- Bench
- B.P. SINGH, R.V. RAVEENDRAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 96, 96(3); Constitution
Headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section 96-0rder XX!ll, Rule 3- landlord-tenant dispute-Compromise resulting in consent decree-Appeal C against--Maintainability of-Held: No appeal is maintainable against a consent decree in view of the bar created by s.96-0nly remedy available to a party to a a decree in terms of it and establish that there was no compromise. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-0rder XX/JI, Rule 3-Compromise of D suits-Difference between first and second parts of Rule 3-Explained-Suit by landlord for recovery of possession-Tenant-defendant agreed to vacate suit
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)