Supreme Court · 1999 INSC 91 · Decided 9 March 1999
Punnu Ram and ORS. v. Chiranji Lal Gupta (Dead) BY LRS. and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1999 INSC 91 · [1999] 1 S.C.R. 940
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3298/1990
- Decided
- 9 March 1999
- Bench
- M. JAGANNADHA RAO, M.B. SHAH (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 : Sections · 19(4)(a) & (b). 19(3) and 20-A. C FactorSc-Laid down in S. 19(4}-Cumulative or altemative-Held, are to be considered as altemative before granting pennission under S. 19(3 )-But if the competent autho1ity is satisfied that in S. 19(4)(b), it must provide altemative accommodation within a reasonable time-Fwther, if building is required for demolition or reconstntction or improvement, the D tenant is fully protected under S. 20-A. E In this appeal, arising from the judgment of the High Court, the following question
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)