Supreme Court · 1995 INSC 675 · Decided 2 November 1995

Punjab State and ANR. v. Darshan Kumar

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1995 INSC 675 · [1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 727
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 10269/1995
Decided
2 November 1995
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Limitation Act

Headnote

B Seivice Law : Increments-Withholding of-Suit filed on the ground that orders were not communicated--Suit decreed by T1ial Court and upheld by Appellate C Court-Suit-Whether ban-ed by limitatiort-Held : Plea of non-communica- tion not taken-F.,xcept two orders, all other orders passed before suit challenging the orders passed by the competent authority, withholding his increments. The Civil Court held that D since the procedure contemplated nuder the relevant rules had not been followed in conducting the enquiry, the suit was not barred by limitation. The Appellate Court had only

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)