Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 22 · Decided 11 January 2005
Pu Myllai Hlychho and ORS. v. State of Mizoram and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 22 · [2005] 1 S.C.R. 279
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 661/2003
- Decided
- 11 January 2005
- Bench
- R.C. LAHOTI, SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, B.N. SRIKRISHNA, G.P. MATHUR (5-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 166(3)
Headnote
~ --~ ,+ :> "' PU MYLLAI HL YCHHO AND ORS. v. STATE OF MIZORAM AND ORS. JANUARY 11, 2005 [R.C. LAHOTI, CJ., SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, B.N. SRIKRISHNA AND G.P. MATHUR, JJ.) Constitution of India, 1950-Sixth Schedule as amended by (Constitution (Amendment) Act, nominate members-Mere consultation with Council of Ministers would not mean that Governor failed to exercise discretionary power vested in him-Nomination held valid District Councils-Nominated Members-Termination of membership- Validity of-Scheme prescribing nominated members to hold office at
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)