Supreme Court · 1995 INSC 325 · Decided 2 May 1995
PT. Rishikesh and ANR. ETC. v. SMT. Salma Begum ETC. ETC.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1995 INSC 325 · [1995] 3 S.C.R. 1062
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1266/1979
- Decided
- 2 May 1995
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, N. VENKATACHALA, S. SAGHIR AHMAD (3-judge bench)
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 5; Constitution Article 254, 25, 14, 254(1)
Headnote
Constitution of India-Article 254-fl.epugnancy-meaning of-State law • and the Central Law should occupy the same field or operate in col/ison C course. D E Constitution of India-Article 25<}-{)istinction between "making" and "commencement" of an Act-State law repugnant Ct;nstitution of India-Article 254-Amendment to Order 15 Rule 2 of CPC by the Parliamenf-State Act not amending Order 15 Rule 2 of CPC-Held there is no repugnancy-U.P. Civil Laws (Reform and Amend­ ment) Act, 1976. Words and phrases-11made" and 11commencement11--Meaning of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)