Supreme Court · 2007 INSC 106 · Decided 2 February 2007

Prem Lala Nahata and ANR. v. Chandi Prasad Sikaria

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2007 INSC 106 · [2007] 2 S.C.R. 261
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 446/2007
Decided
2 February 2007
Bench
S.B. SINHA, P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
CPC Section 99

Headnote

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section 99; Orders /, JI and Vll Rule ll(d) A B Misjoinder of plaintiff and cause of action-Nature and effect of- C Held-They are not a bar entertaining of suit as (i) they were only procedural (ii) defendant does not have an absolute right to contend that such a suit in such a case as relating to two suits (iv) Court was empowered to consolidate different suits on basis of common questions of law or fact. D Suit filed by mother and daughter together for recovery of two sums separately lent by them to defendant-Claim based on their transactions with defendant

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)