Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 586 · Decided 23 November 2005
Pratap Singh and ANR. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 586 · [2005] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 439
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 682/1999
- Decided
- 23 November 2005
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, P.P. NAOLEKAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC Section 161
Headnote
B Evidence: Minor-Witness-Contradiction in statement-Effect of-Minor stating that he went directly to his father and narrated the incident to him, whereas C according to another witness, minor came to him first and then went to his father-Acquittal by Trial Court on the ground that the evidence of had arisen as regards the correctness of statement made by minor and he might have been tutored D Non-examination of eye witness-Effect of Non-examination of seizure witness-Effect of-Held: Seizure of material objects cannot be said to have been proved Code of Criminal Procedure,
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)