Supreme Court · 2004 INSC 503 · Decided 8 September 2004
Pratap Rai Tanwani and ANR. v. Uttam Chand and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2004 INSC 503 · [2004] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 197
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 7608/2002
- Decided
- 8 September 2004
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.P. NAOLEKAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Rent Control and Eviction : A B MP. Accommodation Control Act, 1961-Sections 12(1)(j) & 17- C Eviction suit-Bona fide need of premises-Suit decreed-Affirmed by First Appellate Court-Second appeal-During its pendency landlord's son completing studies and going abroad-But High Court held that need did not eclipse merely because certain developments occurred pendente lite-Delivery of possession to landlord-Time extended-However, protection available to D tenant under Section I 7 of the Act in case of non-user of premises by landlord for purpose for which eviction was sought for.
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)