Supreme Court · 1987 INSC 176 · Decided 20 July 1987

Prasun Roy v. Calcutta Metropolitan Development Authority & ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1987 INSC 176 · [1987] 3 S.C.R. 569
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 1466/1987
Decided
20 July 1987
Bench
SABYASACHI MUKHERJI, G.L. OZA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Arbitration Act Section 20

Headnote

~ Arbitration Act, 1940; s. 20-Arbitrator appointed by Court- Parties submitting to his jurisdiction by filing claims, attending sit- &bull; -<(.__ tings-Challenge to appointment order-Whether permissible. Clause 24 of the arbitration agreement between the parties pro- c vided for reference of of the Director/Unit Heads of the respondent Authority, not connected with the particular work. All such officers having already expressed their opinion in respect of the disputes that had arisen, the appellant apprehended that he may not get justice or D proper relief. He, therefore, moved

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)