Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 647 · Decided 27 September 2010
Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma v. State of Uttarakhand
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2010 INSC 647 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 1064
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1699/2007
- Decided
- 27 September 2010
- Bench
- P. SATHASIVAM, B.S. CHAUHAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 302, 307; CrPC Section 161, 313
Headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 302 and 307 - Conviction under - Property dispute - Firing by accused resulting in death of C three and injuries to three - Conviction u/ss. 302 and 307 by courts below - Interference with - Held: Not called for - FIR was lodged promptly and accused was named who committed the offence - All eye-witnesses including injured witnesses attributed commission of the offence only o to the accused in their statements uls. 161 Cr.P.C., though they turned hostile later - Unwarranted attitude bn the part of witnesses disentitles any benefit to accused who
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)