Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 879 · Decided 7 July 2009

Olympic Industries v. Mulla Hussainy Bhai Mulla Akberally & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2009 INSC 879 · [2009] 10 S.C.R. 338
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 4148/2009
Decided
7 July 2009
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE, H.L. DATTU (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
CPC

Headnote

~. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908: c Or.8, r.9 - Subsequent pleadings - Additional written statement - Held: Even by filing an amendment or additional written statement, it is open to defendant to add a new ground of defence or to substitute or alter the defence or even to take - written statement so long as the D pleadings do not result in causing grave injuries/irretrievable A., prejudice to plaintiff - Mere def Py is not sufficient to refuse amendment of pleadings or an additional written statement - High Court was not justified in rejecting tenant's application for

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)