Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 1515 · Decided 19 December 1996
Net Raj Singh v. State of M.P.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 1515 · [1996] SUPP. 10 S.C.R. 375
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 617/1992
- Decided
- 19 December 1996
- Bench
- A.S. ANAND, K.T. THOMAS (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 396, 411; Evidence Act Section 101to111, 114
Headnote
v. STATE OF M.P. DECEMBER 19, 1996 (DR. AS. ANAND AND KT. THOMAS, JJ.) Evidence Act, 1872 : Sections 101 to 111, 114-Burden of proof­ Presumptions-Rule and effect of A B Section 114 Illustration (a)-f'resumption--Drawing of-Possession of C silver todal within two days of dacoity-No evidence of stolen property-When robbery (or dacoity) and murder fanned part of same transaction, court could draw a presumption that the possessor was the murderer also-In the circumstances of the case it would not be sound D to draw a presumption beyond accused being receiver of stolen proper­
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)