Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 548 · Decided 2 November 2001
Nazir Ahmad Bhait v. State of Delhi
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 548 · [2001] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 1
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 371/2001
- Decided
- 2 November 2001
- Bench
- K.T. THOMAS, S.N. VARIAVA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC
Headnote
B Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987: Section 15( 1 )-Confession-Caution-Administering of-Held: The ac- cused should be cautioned that he is not bound to make the confession and that, c if he does so, it may be used as evidence against him-There is no requirement · is enough if the caution is administered before the accused niakes the confessional statement-Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules. D The appellant-accused was convicted under Section 4 of the Terror- ist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 and sentenced to rigor-
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)