Supreme Court · 2003 INSC 506 · Decided 23 September 2003
Nawal Singh v. State of U.P. and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2003 INSC 506 · [2003] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 1046
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2898/2001
- Decided
- 23 September 2003
- Bench
- M.B. SHAH, AR. LAKSHMANAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 235
Headnote
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992-Rule 2-.Compulsory retirement of judicial officers-Legality of­ Held: The finding of the Screening Committee that appellants-judicial officers were not suitable for continuing in service beyond the age of 58 years was C had followed the procedure for compulsory retirement prescribed in Rule 56-Also, there is no allegation that orders were arbitrary or malafide-Hence, there is no illegality in the order of compulsory retirement- U.P. Fundamental Rules-Rule 56. D U.P. Fundamental Rules-Rule 56-Applicability
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)