Supreme Court · 1966 INSC 87 · Decided 25 March 1966
Narandas Mokardas Gaziwala & ORS. v. S. P. AM. Papammal & ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1966 INSC 87 · [1966] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 38
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 177/1964
- Decided
- 25 March 1966
- Bench
- K. SUBBA RAO, V. RAMASWAMI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Evidence Act Section 92; Contract Act Section 213
Headnote
MOKARDAS GAZIWALA It ORS. v. S. P. AM. PAPAMMAL & ANR. March 25, 1966 (K. SUBBA RAO AND V. RAMASWAM!, JJ.J Principal and Agent-Whether Agent can sue Principal for ren· dition of accounts. Indian Evidence Act, 1872, s. 92, Proviso 3-0ral agreement not to enforce promisso711 note till a suit claiming en­ forcement of a promissory note the agent had executed in their favour. The agent pleaded an oral agreement by which the prmeipals were not to enforce the promissory note during the period of the agency and unless the sum remained due and payable after accounting. The
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)