Supreme Court · 1953 INSC 9 · Decided 29 January 1953
Nalinakhya Bysack v. Shyam Sunder Haldar and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1953 INSC 9 · [1953] 1 S.C.R. 533
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 96/1952
- Decided
- 29 January 1953
- Bench
- MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Rent Control Act
Headnote
S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 533 who is treated as agent under section 43 may not fall 19S3 within any of the several categories of income, profits T · f d · ' 4" Th 1 urnar or gams re erre to m section :6. e anguage Mm·rison ct co., of section 43 will also attract the h . 'es enga • a le un er this Act an may even attract t e provi- · sions of section 4(l)(a). In our opinion there is no Das J. warrant for the contention that an appointment of a person as a statutory agent under section 43 only attracts section 42 for such appointment is for all
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)