Supreme Court · 1963 INSC 233 · Decided 25 November 1963
N.A. Malbari and BROS. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1963 INSC 233 · [1964] 5 S.C.R. 560
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 878/1962
- Decided
- 25 November 1963
- Bench
- A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Income Tax Act
Headnote
COURT REPORTS (1964] 1963 pute must be governed by Rule S(a)(i) of the respon­ dent's Standing Orders. Workmen of Dewan Tea In the result, we reverse the finding of the Tribunal Estate and Ors. !hat the lay <!ff 4eclared by the .respon~e!lt for 45 days v m 1959 was Justified. That bemg so, position, under the relevant Rule J. they could not validly declare a lay off at all, nor could they have declared the lay off in exercise of their alleged common law right. The questions referred to the Tribunal must, therefore, be answered in favour of the appellants. The appeal is
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)