Supreme Court · 2011 INSC 487 · Decided 13 July 2011

Mustkeem @ Sirajudeen v. State of Rajasthan

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2011 INSC 487 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 101
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1327/2008
Decided
13 July 2011
Bench
A.K. GANGULY, DEEPAK VERMA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 302134, 304134, 4, 25; CrPC Section 162, 161; Evidence Act Section 27; Constitution Article 226; Arms Act Section 4, 25

Headnote

Penal Code, 1860: s. 302134 - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - c Conviction by trial court - Upheld by High Court - HELD: Where the case rests squarely on circumstantial evidence, the inference of guilt can be justified only when all the incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be of the accused or the guilt D of any other person - In the instant case, the eye-witnesses and one of the recovery witness, having retracted their statements uls 161CrPC, were not believed bY courts below - As regards other witnesses, there are several discrepancies and contradictions in

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)