Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 767 · Decided 8 May 2009
Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and ORS. v. State of Maharashtra
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 767 · [2009] 8 S.C.R. 465
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 967/2009
- Decided
- 8 May 2009
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, P. SATHASIVAM (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC Section 167(2), 167
Headnote
• Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999: Section 21 - lnterpretatiol]_ of - Held: There is nothing in c the language of second proviso inserted in Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. by Section 21(2) of the Act to indicate that power of extension can be exercised only once - Power of exercise power from time to time - However, the total period for filing charge-sheet/cha/Ian cannot D exceed 180 days - On facts of the case, held the prosecution having filed the charge sheet, application for bail filed on default ground rightly rejected by the courts below. The appellants
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)