Supreme Court · 2004 INSC 36 · Decided 15 January 2004
Mohinder Kumar v. State of Haryana
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2004 INSC 36 · [2004] 1 S.C.R. 529
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 760/1997
- Decided
- 15 January 2004
- Bench
- K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, B.N. SRIKRISHNA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC
Headnote
B Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954: S. 7 rlw s.16, ss. 19(3) and WA-Prosecution u/s 7 read with s. 16- C Salt of a particular brand sold by shopkeeper-Found deficient of requisite quantity of iodine-Prosecution of shopkeeper-Accused contending that he purchased the article from the by trial court­ Conviction and sentence confirmed by High Court-Held, the trial court proceeded on the assumption that the appellant admitted genuineness of the D Bill and that he conceded that he had sold the adulterated article to the first accused-But the evidence on record shows that
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)