Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 424 · Decided 22 March 1996
MOHD. Aslam v. Union of India and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 424 · [1996] 3 S.C.R. 782
- Case number
- WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 135/1996
- Decided
- 22 March 1996
- Bench
- J.S. VERMA, N.P. SINGH, K. VENKATASWAMI (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Writ / Constitutional
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 32; Representation of the People Act Section 123(3), 123
Headnote
Constitution of India, 1950: A1ticle 32-Writ petition filed for reconsideration of an earlier judg­ C mmt-Held, A1ticle 32 is not available to assail the correctness of a decision on merits or to claim its reconsideration. Representation of the People Act, 1951. S. 123(3), (3-A)-Conupt not main­ tainable-The apprehensions and misgivings expressed in the writ petition are imaginary and baseless-There is no occasion to read in the judgment in Ma11ohar Joshi, something which is not said or to say that it conflicts with concept of secularism in S.R. Bommai where the question
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)