Supreme Court · 1998 INSC 335 · Decided 1 September 1998
Mohan Singh v. Late Amar Singh Through the LRS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1998 INSC 335 · [1998] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 252
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 14918/1996
- Decided
- 1 September 1998
- Bench
- A.S. ANAND, M. SRINIVASAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 192, 196; CPC; Rent Control Act Section 21
Headnote
Rent Control and Eviction : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 : Section 21. Tenancy-For a limited period-Pennission f 01~Tenant raised objec­ tion after expi1y of limited pe1iod of tenancy that landlord obtained pemiis­ sion by fraud and misrepresentation-Held : Such objection should be raised pe1iod of tenancy and not after its expiiy-171e 'tenant should raise such an D objection immediately after he comes to know of the landlord's fraud and misrepresentation-171ere must be exceptional circumstances for allowing the tenant to raise such a plea after expby of the limited pe1iod of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)