Supreme Court · 1988 INSC 96 · Decided 7 April 1988
Mohan Laxman Hede v. Noormohamed Adam Shaikh
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1988 INSC 96 · [1988] 3 S.C.R. 461
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1449/1987
- Decided
- 7 April 1988
- Bench
- R.S. PATHAK, M.H. KANIA, N.D. OJHA (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 136; Rent Control Act
Headnote
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, t947-Seciion 12(3)(b)-'Regularity' in payment-Significance of­ Exact or mathematical punctuality not required. Appellant took the tenancy or the premises in question on an agreed monthly rent of Rs.22 + Rs.2.20 per month on account of arrears of rent from J.6. 1976 to 30.11. 76. In response to the notice issued by the Respondent, appellant sent a money order to Respondent treating him as the Muktyar or agent of the previous land­ lord. The respondent refused the money order. Thereafter the appel­ lant filed an
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)