Supreme Court · 1991 INSC 233 · Decided 13 September 1991
Mohan Kumar Singhania and ORS. ETC. Etc v. Union of India and ORS. ETC. Etc
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1991 INSC 233 · [1991] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 46
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5439/1990
- Decided
- 13 September 1991
- Bench
- S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, M. FATHIMA BEEVI, K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution
Headnote
SINGHANIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC SEPTEMBER 13, 1991 B [S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, M. FATHIMA BEEVI AND K. JA YACHANDRA REDDY, JJ. ] Civil Services Examination Rules: Rules 4,8 and 17. C Rule 4-Second proviso-Nature, scope and constitutional validity ~ of-Held proviso ~955--There is dynamic and rational nexus between the proviso and the' object to be achieved-Proviso held applicable to candidates belonging to D Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. E Rule 8-f'urpose of the Rule-Explained. Rule 17--Proviso-Validity of- Proviso held valid. Constitution of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)