Supreme Court · 1963 INSC 44 · Decided 22 February 1963
Meenglas Tea Estate v. Its Workmen
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1963 INSC 44 · [1964] 2 S.C.R. 165
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 359/1962
- Decided
- 22 February 1963
- Bench
- P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 165 strictly cumtrued. This Court again in 1'he State of Uttar Pmde.sh v. Maham.med 8ayeed (1 ), applied the strict rule of comtruction of a surety bond in that case. In the present case a strict construction of the bond leads to the only conclusion that a demand of the Court dismiss the application for execution filed by the first n~spondent against the appellant. But we do not think that this is fit case for award­ ing costs to the appellant. She has failed to raise this objection specifically in her objections or to place before the learned District Judge the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)