Supreme Court · 2004 INSC 611 · Decided 15 October 2004
Mathakala Krishnaiah v. V. Rajagopal
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2004 INSC 611 · [2004] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 547
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 6784/2004
- Decided
- 15 October 2004
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K. THAKKER (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Leave Granted & Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 100
Headnote
KRISHNAIAH A v. V. RAJAGOPAL OCTOBER 15, 2004 [ARIJITPASAYAT ANDC.K. THAKKER,JJ.] B Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section JOO-Second appeal-Disposal of by High Court without formulating substantial question of law-Justification of-Held: It is for the High Court to formulate a substantial appeals, the issue involved was as to whether the High Court was justified in disposing of the second appeal without formulating the D substantial question of law, as mandated by Section 100 CPC. Appellant contended that the High Court can only exercise its jurisdiction under section 100 CPC in
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)