Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 196 · Decided 9 April 2001
Manoharlal v. Vinesh Anand and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 196 · [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1036
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 466/2001
- Decided
- 9 April 2001
- Bench
- AJAY PRAKASH MISRA, U.C. BANERJEE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC Section 195(l)(b), 195(3), 340, 195; CPC; Arbitration Act
Headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974-Sections 195(l)(b), 195(3) and 340-Arbitrator-Whether a Court-Applicability of provisions of Section 340 Cr.P.C.-Held, Arbitrator cannot be tenned to be a Court­ C Pmvisions of Section 340 Cr.P.C. not applicable-Arbirration and Concilia­ tion Act, 1996. Act, 1996, can be termed to be a Court under Section 195(3) Cr.P.C. and the applicability of ~ D Section 340 Cr.P.C. in a proceeding before the Arbitrator were the main E issues involved in the case. Appellant contended that Court means and implies an authority to decide controversy between
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)