Supreme Court · 1971 INSC 36 · Decided 28 January 1971
Mangala Kunhimina Umma & ORS. v. Puthivaveottil Paru Amma & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1971 INSC 36 · [1971] 3 S.C.R. 582
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 980/1967
- Decided
- 28 January 1971
- Bench
- G.K. MITTER, A.N. RAY (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
KUNHIMINA UMMA & ORS. v. PUTHIVAVEOTIIL PARU AMMA & ORS. January 28, 1971 [G. K. MITTER AND A. N. RAY, JJ,J Kera/a L<11d Reforms Act 1964, s. 2(22)-'Kanam'-Definition of~ Document purporting to be ka11am whether lease or mortgage-Tests­ Description in- docu1nent not sufficient present respon­ <lents. The document had a counter-part Ex. A-J,. The suit was filed for the redemption of the kanam on payment of the mortgage debt. The appellants contended in defence that Ex. B-6 was not a mortgage deed but a lease and, therefore, there was no right to redeem. One of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)