Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 414 · Decided 12 September 2005
Management of Kalpataru Vidysamasthey (R) and ANR. v. S.B. Gupta and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 414 · [2005] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 152
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3536/2003
- Decided
- 12 September 2005
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, H.K. SEMA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 115
Headnote
Service Law: Adhoc appointment-Probation period-Expiry of-Employee relieved C from service-Challenge ti:r-Held: Employee has no right to continue in the post as the appointment came to an end by ejjlux of time. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section I I 5-Revisional Jurisdiction­ Finding of jurisdiction cannot reappreciate evidence and interfere with the D findings unless they are perverse and there has been non-application of mind. The question which arose for consideration in the present appeal is whether respondent-employee appointed on probation could be reli• .. .!<I
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)