Supreme Court · 1960 INSC 60 · Decided 24 March 1960
Management of Kairbetta Estate, Kotagiri v. Raj Amanickam and OTHERS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1960 INSC 60 · [1960] 3 S.C.R. 371
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 91/1959
- Decided
- 24 March 1960
- Bench
- P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.C. DAS GUPTA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Industrial Disputes Act Section 25C, 2(1), 33C(2)
Headnote
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 371 rationalisation scheme required them to do, they refus­ ed to do work, which the employer had no right in law to ask them to do. It is difficult to say that ·this amounted to a "strike" by the workmen ; but even if it could be said to be a " workmen, unable to work 'in consequence of the lock­ out, are entitled to wages for the period of absence, caused. by such lock-out. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Appeal dismissed. MANAGEMENT OF KAIRBETTA ESTATE, KOTAGIRI v. RAJ AMANICKAM AND OTHERS. (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR and
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)