Supreme Court · 2003 INSC 349 · Decided 31 July 2003
Madan Mohan Rajgarhia v. M/S. Mahendra R. Shah & BROS. and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2003 INSC 349 · [2003] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 52
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 12645/1996
- Decided
- 31 July 2003
- Bench
- V.N. KHARE, K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, S.B. SINHA (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Arbitration Act Section 34, 53
Headnote
Arbitration Act, 1940: S. 34-Stay of suit-Stock exchange-Non-member filing a recovery suit C against a member-Member filing an application before trial court for stay of suit contending that the dispute was covered under the arbitration clause­ Contention of plaintiff that as he was a of the relevant clause in the Bill, as a whole, would clearly.show that the clause is quite wide and comprehensive D enough to cover the cause of the plaintiff-Contract-Clause in a Bill-Effect of Words and Phrases- 'any other person '-Meaning of CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)