Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 566 · Decided 14 November 2005
Madan Lal and Anr v. Bal Krishan and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 566 · [2005] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 736
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 918/2000
- Decided
- 14 November 2005
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, TARUN CHATTERJEE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 100
Headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section JOO-Second appeal-Disposal of by High Court without formulating substantial question of law-Justification C of-Held: It is essential for High Court to formulate a substantial question of law and hear the appeal on the question formulated-In absence, such substantial question of law. In this appeal, the issue involved was as to whether the High Court was D justified in allowing the second appeal without formulating the substantial question of law, as mandated by Section 100 CPC. Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. In view of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)