Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 478 · Decided 4 October 2005
M/S. Sait Nagjee Purushotham and CO. LTD. v. Vimalabai Prabhulal and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 478 · [2005] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 973
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1113/2003
- Decided
- 4 October 2005
- Bench
- ARUN KUMAR, A.K. MATHUR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC; Constitution; Companies Act
Headnote
PURUSHOTHAM AND CO. LTD. v. VIMALABAI PRABHULAL AND ORS. OCTOBER 4, 2005 [ARUN KUMAR AND A.K. MATHUR, JJ.) Rent Control and Eviction: Kera/a Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965: Section I I (3)-Bonafide need, premises required for expansion of business-Eviction-Maintainability premises not bonafide since landlord and his sons are already having business at other D places and one son has settled abroad, is unsustainable-Furthermore, landlord-dispute takes long time and one cannot wait indefinitely nor development of events can be stopped-Bonafide need is to be seen on
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)