Supreme Court · 2002 INSC 448 · Decided 29 October 2002
M/S. Essen Deinki v. Rajiv Kumar
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2002 INSC 448 · [2002] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 499
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 7038/2002
- Decided
- 29 October 2002
- Bench
- U.C. BANERJEE, Y.K. SABHARWAL (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Leave granted
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 227; Industrial Disputes Act Section 25F
Headnote
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Section 25F-Workman-Services­ Termination of on ground of unsatisfactory work-Non-compliance of section A B 25F as workman failing to complete 240 days of service-Reference-Labour C Court holding that as workman had not completed 240 days of service termination the order of labour Court­ Justification of-Held, the proof of working for 240 days is on employee and workman has stated at the stage of evidence that he has not worked for 240 days, thus High Court erred in reversing the order of labour Court-High D Court could not overturn the finding of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)