Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 395 · Decided 5 July 2006
M/S. Crawford Bayley and CO. and ORS. v. Union of India and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 395 · [2006] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 240
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 171/2004
- Decided
- 5 July 2006
- Bench
- H.K. SEMA, A.K. MATHUR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 254(2), 14, 77; Rent Control Act; Maharashtra Rent Control Act
Headnote
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971- Section 3(n) Second proviso-Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999-Tenancy C of public premises-Notice for termination of tenancy-By Estate Officer under 1971 Act-Notice challenged questioning Constitutional validity of Section 3 and its to Allocation of Business Rules-Dismissal of Writ. Petition by High Court-On appeal, held: Constitutional validity of Section 3 has already been upheld by Supreme Court-Proviso to Section 3 is also not D unconstitutional as the Estate Officer appointed by the concerned administrative
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)