Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 185 · Decided 5 April 2005

M/S Channy Enterprises v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2005 INSC 185 · [2005] 3 S.C.R. 251
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2415/2005
Decided
5 April 2005
Bench
RUMA PAL, C.K. THAKKER (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Central Excise Act Section 3A

Headnote

Excise: Central Excise Act, 1944-Section 3A-lnduction Furnace Annual C Capacity Determination Rules, 1997-Rules 3 and 4-Circular dated 26-2- 1998-Central Excise Rules, 1944-Rule 96(ZP)-Hot rolled steel products­ Levy of duty on the basis of Annual Capacity of Production(ACP)-Assessee having upon the 1998 Circular determining the ACP by clubbing D the capacity of both the mills-Correctness of-Held: Correct-The 1998 Circular clearly says that the capacity of the higher of the two mills would be taken for assessing the ACP only if each rolling mill did not have a separate heating

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)