Supreme Court · 1999 INSC 225 · Decided 5 May 1999
M.R.F. LTD. v. Jagdish Lal and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1999 INSC 225 · [1999] 2 S.C.R. 1089
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2710/1999
- Decided
- 5 May 1999
- Bench
- A.S. ANAND, S.B. MAJMUDAR, M. JAGANNADHA RAO (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Consumer Protection Act Section 13(l)(c), 13
Headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 : Section 13(l)(c) A B Consumer Protection-District Forum.:.._Defect in goods-Determination C of-Analysis or test of the goods- Reference to laboratory-Procedure prescribed for-Need to follow-In this case, the complainant had given the tyre and the tube which had under Section l 3(l)(c) of the Act was, therefore, not capable of being followed because the comlainant D was not in possession of the tyre and the tube- No evidence to suggest that the appellant had returned the tyre and the tube to the respondent-Therefore no fault can be found with the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)