Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 585 · Decided 12 December 2000
M.NARSINGA Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 585 · [2000] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 584
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 719/1995
- Decided
- 12 December 2000
- Bench
- K.T. THOMAS, U.C. BANERJEE, R.P. SETHI (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- Evidence Act Section 114, 4; Prevention of Corruption Act Section 20, 13(1)(d)
Headnote
RAO v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DECEMBER 12, 2000 B [K.T. THOMAS, U.C. BANERJEE AND R.P. SETHI. JJ.] Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section JU legal presumption Held. can be drawn if it is proved that the accused has accepted or agreed C to accept any gratification, the same need not be Meaning of--ln the context of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -Section 20(/). Appellant was charged for offences under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, being caught red handed in a trap arranged by the officials of the Anti Corruption
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)