Supreme Court · 1955 INSC 32 · Decided 20 April 1955
M.K.RANGANATHAN and Another v. Government of Madras and OTHERS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1955 INSC 32 · [1955] 2 S.C.R. 374
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 20/1955
- Decided
- 20 April 1955
- Bench
- SUDHI RANJAN DAS, NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI, BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution; Companies Act Section 171
Headnote
Amar Singhji v. 'State of Rajasth•n Venkataram• Ayyar J. 1955 April 20 374 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1955] properties are within the exemption enacted in sec­ tion 20. To sum up: The impugned Act is not open to at­ tack either on the ground that the Rajpramukh had no legislative the legislatiYc competence of the State, and it is protected by article 31-A. But the notification is bad as regards properties comprised in Petitions Nos. 392 and 488 of 1954, as izoras are not within the impugned Act. The properties mentioned in Petition No: 36 of 1955 are declicatcJ for
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)