Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 858 · Decided 16 November 2006
M.D., Karnataka Handloom DEV. CORPN. LTD. v. Sri Mahadeva Laxman Raval
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 858 · [2006] SUPP. 9 S.C.R. 60
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3251/2005
- Decided
- 16 November 2006
- Bench
- AR. LAKSHMANAN, ALTAMAS KABIR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(00), 25F
Headnote
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-ss.2(00) & 25F-Appointmentfor specific period on specified honorarium-Termination of services on expiry of such C specific period-Held, does not amount to retrenchment-Since appointment was only on contract basis. Respondent was engaged under a time bound specific on a specified honorarium. D The question which arose for consideration in the present appeal is whether Respondent was not a worker for purposes ofS.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 194.7 but was employed on contract basis for a specific period and hence cannot be said to have been retrenched
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)