Supreme Court · 2015 INSC 54 · Decided 20 January 2015
Laxmidevamma & ORS. v. Ranganath & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2015 INSC 54 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 921
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 176/2015
- Decided
- 20 January 2015
- Bench
- V. GOPALA GOWDA, R. BANUMATHI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 100
Headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - s.100- Second appeal - Concurrent findings of fact - Plaintiffs seeking declaration A B of title over 'A' schedule property and that the defendants C encroached upon 'B' schedule property - Concurrent findings by courts below that 'A' schedule property was earmarked plaintiffs proved their ownership to 'A' schedule property - In second appeal, High Court held that declaration to plaintiffs' right cannot be granted D since first plaintiff earmarked 'A' schedule property for road and that she could not have full fledged right - Sustainability of- Held: Not
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)