Supreme Court · 2014 INSC 163 · Decided 4 March 2014
Lalitkumar V. Sanghavi (D) TH. LRS. Neeta Lalit Kumar Sanghavi & ANR. v. Dharamdas V. Sanghavi & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2014 INSC 163 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 558
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3148/2014
- Decided
- 4 March 2014
- Bench
- B.S. CHAUHAN, JASTI CHELAMESWAR, M.Y. EQBAL (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Arbitration Act Section 14, 32, 11
Headnote
C ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996: ss.14, 32 - Termination of arbitration proceedings by arbitrator on the ground that the claimant did not take interest in the matter and did not pay the fees - Fresh application uls. 11 for appointment as not maintainable on 0 the ground that remedy lies in invoking writ jurisdiction and not application u/s. 11 - Held: The order by which the Arbitral Tribunal terminated the arbitral proceedings could only fall within the scope of s.32(2)(c) i.e. the continuation of the proceedings has
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)