Supreme Court · 2002 INSC 229 · Decided 24 April 2002

Lalit Kumar Jain and ANR. v. Jaipur Traders Corporation PVT. LTD.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2002 INSC 229 · [2002] 3 S.C.R. 445
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2957/1997
Decided
24 April 2002
Bench
R.P. SETHI, P. VENKATARAMA REDDI (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Specific Relief Act Section 27, 31

Headnote

B Specific Relief Act, 1963-Sections 27 and 31-Equitable Relief-- Entitlement of-On facts, vendor filing suit for cancellation of sale document > and physical possession of property on the ground that vendee committed c breach of contract of sale and the contract stood rescinded-Trial court held, since on facts of the case and conduct of the vendor, recession of contract by vendor not justified, he is not entitled to equitable relief-Order of High Court set aside. D Respondent-company executed sale deed in favour of appellants. Part of the consideration was paid before the

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)