Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 466 · Decided 8 April 2009

Lakshmi & ANR. v. Chinnammal @ Rayyammal & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2009 INSC 466 · [2009] 5 S.C.R. 661
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2243/2009
Decided
8 April 2009
Bench
S.B. SINHA, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
CPC; Evidence Act; Constitution Article 227

Headnote

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - 0.13 r.10 - Genuineness of a deed challenged before civil court - Initiation of criminal proceedings also - In criminal c proceeding deed sent for examination of signature and thumb, impression of the person challenging it, to forensir;; expert - Plaintiffs report ..., regarding handwriting allowed - But application calling for report regarding thumb impression dismissed - Held: D Dismissal of the later application not justified - If bringing on record a document is essential for proving a case, ordinarily the same should not be refused - The

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)